[Latest News][6]

2016
Achievers
Advisory
Agriculture
Albay
Albay News
Announcements
Banner
Bicol
Bicol Express
bicol local news
bicol local newspaper
Bicol News
bicol news latest
Bicol Songs
Bicol Vigilantes
Bicolana beauties
Bicolano achievers
Bikol news
Binibining Pilipinas
Business
Camarines Norte
Camarines Sur
Caramoan Massacre
Case in Point
Catanduanes
Celebrations
Church
Column
Community
Contributions
Culture
Daet
Daraga
Development
Disaster
Documents
Drugs
Economy
Editorial
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Events
Feature
Features
Filipino News
Food
Food Trip
Government
Headlines
Health
Human Interest
Infographics
Infrastructure
Iriga
Iriga City
Isipon Osipon
Jobs
Jokes
Kantang suanoy
Legazpi
Legazpi City
Letters
Libmanan
Lifestyle
Ligao City
Live
Masbate
masbate city
mayon
MayonPH
Media
Mining
Modelo Bikolano
Nabua
Naga
Naga City
Nagueno
Nation
National
News
News Bullets
OFW
Opinion
Oragon
Orgullo
Palarong Bicol 2014
Palarong Bicol 2015
Penafrancia
Penafrancia 2014
Photos
Places
PNR
Police
Police Report
Politics
Polls
Power
Power Watch
Rawitdawit
Region
Science
Sorosgon
Sorsogon
Sorsogon City
Sorsoson
Special
Sports
Tabaco City
Tigsik
Tips
Tourism
Trending
Trivia
Videos
virac
Weather
Weekly Roundup
Who reads Bicol Standard
Willy Bayola
World
Youth

CA junks injunction vs Casureco II over power rate hike

NAGA CITY—The 5th Division of the Court of Appeals has reversed and set aside the decision of Branch 33 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Pili, Camarines Sur. The said decision permanently enjoined Camarines  Sur II Electric Cooperative (Casureco II) from demanding and collecting payments from its member-consumers or end users.
RTC Judge Marvel Clavecilla summons CASURECO II officers to explain why they should not be cited for indirect contempt of court for not heeding his advice in not imposing higher power rates. (BICOL STANDARD FILE PHOTO)
“Accordingly, the Petition for Injunction filed by Genoviva Dimaiwat, Josephine Leonidas and Evangeline Laurente is ordered DISMISSED and the Permanent Injunction issued by the trial court is hereby DISSOLVED,” according to the dispositive portion of the decision, promulgated June 14, 2014.

It will be recalled that last January, Presiding Judge Marvel Clavecilla of RTC Branch 33 in Pili, reminded the cooperative’s Board of Directors and the General Manager about the permanent injunction which he issued against Casureco II.

In the said RTC decision, coop officials were “permanently enjoined from demanding and collecting payments from the member-consumers  or end-users of Casureco II for the electric consumption last April 2010 and demandable last May 2010 UNLESS the power billing is based on the March 2010 power rate of P4.8939 per kilowatt hour, less the penalty charge imposable for the duration of the TRO as subsequent to March 25, 2010, the expiry date of the extension by APRI of its power supply agreement with CASURECO II, the latter directly purchased its 100% power rates from WESM (Wholesale Electricity Spot Market) at excessively higher rates and without proper notice and hearing.”

The RTC decision was question by the coop board, which raised the following issues.

“First, the Regional Trial Court committed an irreversible error in holding that it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the petition.

Second, assuming that the Regional Trial Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the petition, it committed an error in holding that the petition can be classified as a class suit even if all types of member-consumers were not represented in the petition.”

The Court of Appeals held that the appeal of the electric cooperative, represented by then General Manager Jane Barrameda and then Board President Atty. Nixon Tabora, is meritorious.

“The trial court had erroneously arrogated upon itself the jurisdiction to pass upon the issue of whether or not Casureco II is authorized to collect unannounced increase in the Generation Systems Charge to its member-consumers given the fact that authority to resolve this controversy, the jurisdiction of which is initially lodged with the administrative body of special competence, is the ERC,” said the CA.

Meanwhile, as a result of the RTC decision, the electric cooperative allegedly suffered a tremendous amount of losses in its operation.

While the RTC ordered the electric cooperative to collect P8.42 per kilowatt hour, the coop computed the proper rate at P15.39 per kilowatt hour.

The members of the Board as well as the management, despite the injunctive writ, pushed through with the P15.39 per kilowatt hour rate. This caught the ire of the court, since it violates the injunctive writ. At that point, the presiding judge threatened to hold theBoard of Directors as well as coop officials liable for indirect contempt. This, the court articulated, would happen if the said officials would continue imposing the much higher electricity rate.

Atty. Vicky Briones, the NEA Project Supervisor assigned to Casureco II, confirmed to BICOL STANDARD in an interview that as of March 2014, the coop has suffered losses amounting to at least P500 million, because of its inability to collect the proper rate.

Said losses will still substantially increase if the losses for the months of April, May and June are factored in.

Atty. Briones added that she will meet with the members of the management committee and the Board to discuss the issue.

Meanwhile, she explained that while she is aware of the fact that the CA decision is not yet final, she would already convince the petitioners not to prolong the legal process, as it is hurting the financial status of the coop.

The petitioners could not yet be reached for their comments at press time.—BICOLSTANDARD.COM

RELATED STORIES:

Bicol Standard

Bicol news

Start typing and press Enter to search